EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.
How EY can help
-
We merge traditional and innovative approaches, combined with a consistent methodology, to deliver quality audit services to you. Find out more.
Read more
Recognising these risks, many banks have announced the ambition to reduce their carbon footprint both for their own operations as well as entities they finance, with some committing to stop financing certain sectors.
How banks are factoring in climate risks in ECL
Recently issued 2024 annual reports for a selection of large UK and European banks indicate that, while both transition and physical climate risks were generally considered in their ECL assessments, whether through macroeconomic variables, scenario analysis or overlay adjustments, most banks reported that these risks had no material impact on their impairment charges.
In the UK, only a minority of banks had an ECL provision for climate risk, focusing primarily on transition risks, although amounts were marginal in proportion to the overall ECL. In Europe, some banks applied management overlays, not only for transition risks, but also for physical risks in addition to model-driven outcomes. Even in this case, amounts were generally small, with some exceptions.
To date, some banks in the UK and Europe have disclosed a specific amount in their ECL estimates, while others indicated that the climate risk was included in the estimate of ECL without any quantification, as illustrated in these extracts from 2024 annual reports.
The picture that emerges from these banks’ annual reports raises questions about how the approach taken by banks will continue to evolve when considering the impact of both transition and physical climate risks and opportunities in the ECL assessment and in the connectivity disclosures. Moreover, it raises the question whether there is any difference between UK and European banks in this assessment and, if so, whether this is driven by unique circumstances, including market and geographical conditions.
There is also a question on how banks can enhance their disclosures on how they assess and account for climate risks.